The return of spring training can mean but one thing – a chance for me to make some spectacularly wrong predictions based on the information coming from Port St. Lucie. So when the Mets win the 2009 world series with a perfect game from Livan Hernandez, and grand slams from Tatis (two, off the same pitcher in the same inning), Murphy, Anderson and Castillo, remember, you read it here first.
Luis Castillo to be Lead Off Hitter
While Luis Castillo may possess the skill set (high OBP, high speed, low power) of an (aging) lead off man, the Mets already have a much better, much younger lead off hitter in Jose Reyes. Is making Reyes bat third so that Castillo can lead off really a good idea?
Firstly, if Castillo bats first, he gets the most ABs of any Mets player, which seems a bit of a waste. Secondly, the last thing Reyes needs is to think he is there to drive in runs; that can only lead to him taking more of those horrible home run cuts at the ball that drastically reduce his effectiveness. Finally, remember all those early inning leads from last year where Reyes got on base, stole second, then was brought home by Wright or Beltran? Do you really think Castillo can do that as effectively? No? Good. Next question.
If you really are enamoured of Castillo’s lead off skills, then bat him 9th, where he can be a quasi-lead off hitter in front of Reyes, without taking away at bats.
Daniel Murphy to be every day left fielder
Declaring Murphy to be your every day left fielder so early in Spring Training seems a tad premature. While I am all in favour of giving the kids a chance, in this case, I think the Mets are overestimating how good Murphy will be in 2009.
Does the phrase ‘unsustainably high BABIP’ mean nothing to Jerry Manuel? While Murphy hit .313 with a .397 OBP last year, he benefited from a .386 BABIP (compensating for his high strike out rate). Even with a more realistic BABIP in 2009, Murphy is far from useless. However, Murphy doesn’t really have the power associated with left field (PECOTA prediction of .263/.327/.405 with 12 homers), and would be far more valuable to the Mets as a second baseman. More time at AAA seeing if Murphy can play the position could prove a better long term investment.
Not that I expect Tatis to be any better – One of Minaya’s greatest skills appears to be finding washed up old veterans and getting one last good, league minimum wage season from them. His greatest weakness is believing these players will repeat their success once they’ve been signed to a big shiny new contract.
Expect Tatis to be this year’s Jose Valentin/Jorge Sosa/Marlon fucking Anderson (Tatis PECOTA numbers .245/.325/.402 with 6Hrs)
Playing Murphy full time in left field seams to mean that Tatis and Church will share right field duties. But why? If Church still hasn’t recovered from his concussion, he’ll be almost as useless as Marlon. If he has recovered, then his plus defence and pre-concussion hitting suggest he deserves to play full time. (respect to Church for the I Heart NY T-shirt; Church PECOTA of .254/.335/.421, 10 Hr, although no idea what impact his injury last year has on PECOTA)
As one of the few Mets relief pitchers in 2008 to make a positive contribution (if barely) Sanchez should feel aggrieved if he were released to clear room for some unknown quantity in the All New Mets Bullpen. While trading Sanchez for the right (younger) player is worth considering, the idea that he should be released if a trade can’t be made is ridiculous.
Oh Omar, and your weakness for washed up, useless ex- expos.
Livan Hernandez is old and rubbish. I don’t think I need to show any stats to support this.